Houston · Harris County · Galveston · Fort Bend · Federal — Southern District of TexasHouston · Harris County · Galveston

Section 21.18 is the Texas "sextortion" statute. It criminalizes using a threat to obtain intimate images, sexual conduct, or money — the pattern that has become one of the fastest-growing categories of online criminal investigation.

What the Statute Prohibits

A person commits an offense if the person intentionally threatens, including by coercion or extortion, to commit an offense under Chapter 43 or one of a list of enumerated offenses — including trafficking provisions, continuous sexual abuse, indecency, invasive visual recording, and unlawful disclosure of intimate visual material — to obtain, in return for not committing the threatened offense:

  1. intimate visual material;
  2. an act involving sexual conduct causing arousal or gratification; or
  3. a monetary benefit or other benefit of value.

A parallel subsection covers threats to commit offenses under Chapter 19 (homicide) or Chapter 20 (kidnapping and unlawful restraint), or certain trafficking offenses, to obtain the same categories of benefit.

Penalty

Sexual coercion is generally a state jail felony — 180 days to 2 years in a state jail and a fine of up to $10,000 — and a third-degree felony where the defendant has a previous conviction under this section.

In practice these cases are rarely charged alone. Prosecutors commonly add unlawful disclosure of intimate visual material, harassment, stalking, and where a minor is involved, offenses carrying far heavier penalties and registration consequences.

Federal Exposure

Assume a parallel federal investigation

Sextortion communications almost always cross state lines and occur on platforms that preserve and report content. Federal charges — extortion, interstate threats, and where a minor is involved, offenses carrying mandatory minimums — are common. See our federal criminal defense page. Do not speak to investigators and do not delete anything; deletion supports a separate tampering with evidence charge.

Defenses

No threat to commit an enumerated offense. The statute requires a threat to commit one of the specific listed offenses. Angry or crude messages that do not threaten a listed offense do not satisfy the element.

No intent to obtain a listed benefit. The threat must be made to obtain intimate material, sexual conduct, or something of value. Threats made out of anger, without a demand, fall outside the statute.

Identity. These cases are built on accounts, IP logs, and devices. Account compromise, shared devices, spoofed profiles, and offshore actors using a victim's own images are all realistic and provable alternatives.

Context of the full exchange. The State typically offers selected messages. The complete conversation frequently changes the character of what was said.

Related

Charged in Harris County?

Brian Foley is Board Certified in Criminal Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization and a former Harris County Felony Chief Prosecutor; Luis Baez is a former Trial Bureau Chief. Call or text (713) 703-1718 for a free, confidential consultation.

← Back to the Texas Penal Code index

Frequently Asked Questions


What is sexual coercion in Texas?
Under Section 21.18, a person commits an offense by intentionally threatening — including by coercion or extortion — to commit certain listed offenses, in order to obtain intimate visual material, an act involving sexual conduct, or a monetary or other benefit of value in return for not committing the threatened offense.
Is sextortion a felony in Texas?
Sexual coercion is generally a state jail felony, and rises to a third-degree felony if the defendant has a previous conviction under this section. Related conduct is often charged alongside it under other statutes with higher penalties.
Does the threatened offense have to be carried out?
No. The offense is complete when the threat is made with the required intent to obtain one of the listed benefits. Whether the threatened act occurred goes to the evidence, not to the elements.
What if the images were shared consensually before?
Prior consensual exchange is not a defense to threatening to distribute the material. It is, however, relevant context, and it matters to how a prosecutor evaluates the case.
Are these cases usually charged federally?
They frequently are, particularly when the communications cross state lines, involve minors, or occur on major platforms. A person under investigation should assume both state and federal exposure.

Speak With a Houston Criminal Defense Attorney Today


Free, confidential consultation with Board Certified criminal defense attorneys and former prosecutors.

(713) 703-1718